For years I've been trying to learn this liquid animation technique, demonstrated by Gregory Villien and Eduard Mykhailov in some sick tutorials. I thought this homework assignment would be a great chance to push myself and squeeze one out!
In the end I'm happy with the liquid trails. When comping, I realized I had miscalculated my composition and did not have a very interesting frame. I attempted to fill it out with clones of the original. In the future I will give more thought to the overall composition!
Another Take
Experimenting with intersections of RGB to see if they would combine into white (they do - but only for a few frames in this case).
Process
This technique can feel like it's taking FOR EV ER but it's extremely rewarding to play back and see that it's working!
Remainder of Homework Assignment
01. What got you into motion design?
Motion piece: Good Books, Metamorphosis by Buck (2012)
What was the goal or intention of the piece?
To promote and educate about the Good Books service.
To convey the emotional experience of reading a good book.
What are the characteristics of the design and audio?
Design
Hand-drawn, fluid illustrative style
Realistic depictions of surreal elements
Camera lens distortions
Dark, high-contrast palette with bold highlights
Grungy and painterly textures
Audio
Comically irreverent VO
Surreal and unsettling sound design
Crescendo/decrescendo to create structure
What moments of animation made it special?
THE MORPHS
Morph/transition from lady’s bottom to darkened room.
Fluidic morphs between surreal elements.
Do all of the elements fit together?
FUCK YEAH they do.
Viewer is fully engrossed and taken on a journey.
02. Comparing animations.
Video #1 (WINNER)
Smooth easing creates realistic movement
Secondary animations as objects interact
Timing is accurate and natural
Video #2
Linear animation on everything – robotic and unrealistic
Animations are out of sync
Timing is stiff and feels computer-generated
0 Comments
Join the discussion!